USPTO serial 76074697
REDEFINING DINING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2926489Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2005
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REDEFINING DINING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTH MIAMI, FL
NORTH MIAMI, FL
NORTH MIAMI, FL
NORTH MIAMI, FL
North Miami, FL
North Miami, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. Kelber
Michael G. Kelber Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLPTwo North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700Chicago, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the restaurant services of others through incentive reward and loyalty programs and on-line promotions featuring restaurant-related benefits, restaurant management services, and providing merchant information in the fields of restaurant management and promotion services via the global computer network, mass media, and mail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing restaurant information and restaurant reservation services via the global computer network, mass media, and mail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IDINE REWARDS NETWORK INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REWARDS NETWORKS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RTR FUNDING LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RTR FUNDING LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Transmedia Network Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Transmedia Network Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REDEFINING DINING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |