USPTO serial 76074791
MACKAY WATCHMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MACKAY WATCHMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Glasgow, Nova Scotia B2H 5E3, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pay and display machines, namely, electronic automated stand alone machines for motor vehicle parking lot management that receive payment via card or coin, issue receipt and authorization tickets and track allocation of parking services within a defined geographic area; multi-space machines, namely, electronic automated stand alone machines for motor vehicle parking lot management that receive payment via card or coin, track the allocation of individual parking spaces within a defined geographic area; coin identifiers for automated vending machines, parking meters, pay and display machines, pay-by-space machines, and multi-space machines to facilitate the acceptance, discrimination, validation, tabulation and storage of authorized and valid coins deposited for the purpose of purchasing goods and services; card reader modules for vending machines, parking meters, pay and display machines, pay-by-space machines, and multi-space machines to facilitate the acceptance, discrimination, validation, and tabulation and storage of information from cards used for the purpose of purchasing goods and services; software used in the management of electronic parking meter equipment; software for communicating with other computers and with electronic parking equipment such as parking meters, pay and display machines, pay-by-space machines, multi-space machines, automated vending machines and automated metering devices to configure, monitor and audit parking meters, to track the components of parking meter systems, to reconcile the count of cash validated and recorded by parking equipment with the physical count of cash collected from the equipment, to generate and maintain records, and to generate statistical reports; parking meter equipment, namely, parking meters, pay and display machines, pay-by-space machines, multi-space machines, automated vending machines, automated metering devices, housings, poles, meter yokes for installing multiple meters on the same pole, drop boxes for payment of fines, wheel locks for immobilizing vehicles, coin collection pouches, coin collection carts, coin collection boxes, hand held computers for communicating with parking equipment and with remote computers, cradles to interface between computers and hand held computers, and locks and keys; parking meters; credit card sized magnetic coded cards containing magnetic strip or microprocessor capable of information transfer and storage; automated stand alone vending machines that provide goods or services and receive, record, acknowledge, provide physical receipt for, and manage payment for goods and services by way of card or coins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |