USPTO serial 76074925
MOVENPICK LIMITED EDITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3012433Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 2005
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOVENPICK LIMITED EDITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food fresh as well as frozen or as ready-made meals, namely meat, fish, and seafood, sausages, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; salads except macaroni, rice and pasta; jellies; pickles; nuts, namely processed, roasted, or candied; fruit sauces; eggs; milk and milk products, namely butter, cheese, cream, yoghurt and milk drinks, namely milk-based beverages containing coffee, chocolate, tea, or cocoa; edible oils and fats; potato salad; other non-alcoholic chocolate drinks, namely, chocolate milk | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee and coffee extracts; coffee substitutes; tea; cocoa; chocolate and chocolate specialties, namely candies with or without filling; chocolate confectionery, namely, pastry containing or covered with chocolate; sugar; rice; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely corn flakes, snack food, or food bars; tapioca; sago; pasta; bread; sandwiches; biscuits; bakery goods, and pastry; edible ice; flavored ice specialties; honey; treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; spices; ice for cooling purposes; salad, namely pasta, rice, or macaroni; chocolate covered nuts; other non-alcoholic drinks, namely tea, cocoa, coffee or hot chocolate; milk drinks, namely shakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers, mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely ginger ale, lemonade or tomato juice; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrup and other preparations, namely concentrates or powders, for making fruit drinks or fruit juices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Restaurant and bar services; providing temporary housing accommodation of guests; hotel services, namely concierge, or making reservations for others; canteen services; party planning consultation service; take-away restaurants; catering; restaurants featuring home-meal replacement delivery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Movenpick Holding
- Other trademarks owned by Movenpick Holding
- Other trademarks owned by Movenpick Holding
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MOVENPICK LIMITED EDITION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | NEWR | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS APPROVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |