USPTO serial 76075435
ICE TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3036069Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ICE TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
Chuo-ku, Osaka, JP
Other trademarks owned by Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
Chuo-ku, Osaka, JP
Other trademarks owned by Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
Osaka, 541-8538, JP
Other trademarks owned by Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely golf pants, golf socks, track and field shirts, T-shirts, polo shirts, trousers, socks and caps and hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
- Other trademarks owned by Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
- Other trademarks owned by Mizuno Kabushiki Kaisha (Mizuno Corporation)
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ICE TOUCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |