USPTO serial 76075790
Serial No. 76075790
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2917620Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2005
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76075790?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fairport, NY
Fairport, NY
Fairport, NY
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
EL SEGUNDO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauri S. Thompson
Lauri S. Thompson Greenberg Traurig, LLP3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy.Suite 400 N.Las Vegas, NV 89169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for inventory management, outsourcing of inventory management and online brokerage of inventory parts; computer software for stocking analysis, replenishment and deployment of inventory parts for an extended logistics network, material planning, forecasting inventory parts requirements, creating new product introductions, stocking, and integration with a service inventory planning systems; browser based computer software for remotely accessing a primary service inventory parts planning system, reviewing part forecast and schedules, submitting recommendations and adjustments, viewing item data, entering schedule data, adjusting or providing forecasts based on local issues and programs, targeting inventory levels to reflect local based dynamics, contractual obligations, transportation, and customs' issues; computer software for primary service parts inventory planning, forecasting returns, calculating scrap yield, planning upgrade paths for older revisions, scheduling repairs, tracking work in process inventories, modeling of alternate scenarios in real time, automatically presenting action items according to pre-configured business rules, and automatically recommending problem resolution | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2000 |
| 035 | Business consulting services namely advising business on the cost savings associated with service parts inventory management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2000 |
| 036 | Online brokerage of inventory parts by way of a global computer network and consultation related thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Xelus, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Xelus, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Xelus, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CLICK COMMERCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CLICK COMMERCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SERVIGISTICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SERVIGISTICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CLICK ACQUISITIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |