USPTO serial 76075905
O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Houston, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in network operational support and management in the field of computing and communications systems management | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 1999 |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of computer networks in the field of telecommunications systems management | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 1997 |
| 041 | computer training services in the use and operation of computer software systems and computer networks in the field of telecommunications systems management | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 1999 |
| 042 | Installation and maintenance of computer software in the field of telecommunications systems management; computer software systems and computer networks design, customization, and support services for others in the field of telecommunications systems management; consulting services concerning computer software systems and computer networks in the field of telecommunications systems management | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORILLION PARTNERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORILLION PARTNERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORILLION USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORILLION HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORILLION HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Orillion Corporation, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named O
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |