USPTO serial 76076290
INTELLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES USED FOR COMMINUTING, CRUSHING, DESTROYING AND PRESSING DATA CARRIERS, FILES, DOCUMENTS, MICROFILMS AND OTHER SIMILAR MATERIALS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRESSES AND BALING PRESSES; AND PARTS FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PAPER SHREDDERS FOR OFFICE USE; PACKAGING MADE OF SYNTHETIC MATERIAL AND/OR PAPER, NAMELY, WRAPPINGS, BAGS, FILMS AND SACKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |