Drawing for THIRD EYE

USPTO serial 76076560

THIRD EYE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THIRD EYE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Hughes

ROBERT B HUGHES MICHAEL F HUGHES HUGHES LAW FIRM, PLLCSTE 3024164 MERIDIAN STBELLINGHAM, WA 98226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE VIEWING OF IMAGES, EVENTS, PHYSICAL THINGS AND OCCURRENCES OVER WIRELESS AND WIRE COMMUNICATIONS; CREATING AND SAVING CONFIGURATION PROFILES, ARCHIVING AND ARCHIVING WITH A CALENDAR INTERFACE; REMOTE VIEWING OVER ISDN, DSL, CABLE MODEM, T1 AND WIRLESS; VIEWING LIVE AND ARCHIVED VIDEO, BOTH LOCALLY AND REMOTELY; REMOTE VIEWING OF LIVE AND ARCHIVED VIDEO OVER LAN, 1 AND INTERNET ENVIRONMENT; REMOTE VIEWING FROM LIVE DATA OVER THE INTERNETACTIVEJun 30, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 26, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 28, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance