USPTO serial 76076576
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen food products, namely, processed seafood; processed shrimp; processed fruits and vegetables; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting of processed bake potatoes stuffed with sour cream, bacon pieces, and chives; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of chipped beef tips with cream sauce, beef tips with gravy, and chicken with gravy; processed onion rings; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat or poultry and vegetables; processed foods, namely, processed poultry, processed meat, cheese slices, processed cheese, processed potatoes, and frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of chicken, chili and cheese; milk; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of chicken, turkey, pork, meatloaf, or fish and containing one or more of the following-- processed potatoes, processed vegetables, biscuits, rolls, rice, and/or egg rolls, goulash consisting primarily of hamburger, and also containing pasta and tomato sauce; corn dogs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta with vegetables; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta, with hamburger and tomato sauce; frozen food products, namely, egg rolls; Mexican food products, namely, taquitos, tamales, burritos and enchiladas; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of a corn meal crust with meat, cheese, and/or vegetables; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta, and also containing one or more of the following-- rolls, rice, egg rolls, processed potatoes, processed vegetables, cake, cheesecake, or dessert pies consisting primarily of puddings or custard; lasagna; ravioli; tortellini; pasta shells stuffed with cheese; pancakes; waffles; French toast sticks; cookie dough; cinnamon roll dough; fruit pies; apple flautas; sandwiches, namely, sandwiches consisting of ham and cheese; entrees consisting primarily of rice, and also containing meat or poultry and vegetables; pretzels stuffed with cheese or peanut butter and jelly; bread dough; bread, namely, cheese garlic bread, stuffed bread and pre-cooked, ready-to-eat frozen bread with meat, cheese, sauce and/or vegetable filling; croissants; pizza; ice cream, ice cream-based desserts, frozen ice milk, frozen yogurt, frozen sherbet and frozen ice cream confections, frozen yogurt confections, frozen ice milk confections and frozen sherbet confections; chocolate topping; and frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of bread filled with tomato sauce fillings and meat and cheese | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Concentrates used in the preparation of fruit-flavored and fruit juice drinks containing water; and orange juice | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |