Drawing for SCHWAN'S

USPTO serial 76076576

SCHWAN'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCHWAN'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen food products, namely, processed seafood; processed shrimp; processed fruits and vegetables; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting of processed bake potatoes stuffed with sour cream, bacon pieces, and chives; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of chipped beef tips with cream sauce, beef tips with gravy, and chicken with gravy; processed onion rings; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat or poultry and vegetables; processed foods, namely, processed poultry, processed meat, cheese slices, processed cheese, processed potatoes, and frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of chicken, chili and cheese; milk; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of chicken, turkey, pork, meatloaf, or fish and containing one or more of the following-- processed potatoes, processed vegetables, biscuits, rolls, rice, and/or egg rolls, goulash consisting primarily of hamburger, and also containing pasta and tomato sauce; corn dogsACTIVE
030Frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta with vegetables; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta, with hamburger and tomato sauce; frozen food products, namely, egg rolls; Mexican food products, namely, taquitos, tamales, burritos and enchiladas; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of a corn meal crust with meat, cheese, and/or vegetables; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta, and also containing one or more of the following-- rolls, rice, egg rolls, processed potatoes, processed vegetables, cake, cheesecake, or dessert pies consisting primarily of puddings or custard; lasagna; ravioli; tortellini; pasta shells stuffed with cheese; pancakes; waffles; French toast sticks; cookie dough; cinnamon roll dough; fruit pies; apple flautas; sandwiches, namely, sandwiches consisting of ham and cheese; entrees consisting primarily of rice, and also containing meat or poultry and vegetables; pretzels stuffed with cheese or peanut butter and jelly; bread dough; bread, namely, cheese garlic bread, stuffed bread and pre-cooked, ready-to-eat frozen bread with meat, cheese, sauce and/or vegetable filling; croissants; pizza; ice cream, ice cream-based desserts, frozen ice milk, frozen yogurt, frozen sherbet and frozen ice cream confections, frozen yogurt confections, frozen ice milk confections and frozen sherbet confections; chocolate topping; and frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of bread filled with tomato sauce fillings and meat and cheeseACTIVE
032Concentrates used in the preparation of fruit-flavored and fruit juice drinks containing water; and orange juiceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 10, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 27, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance