USPTO serial 76076736
STEELINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEELINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | DESKS; TABLES; FILING CABINETS; SHELVES FOR STORAGE; WHEELED CARTS FOR HOLDING AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT, PRINTERS, COMPUTERS, FAX MACHINES, TELEVISIONS, AND OTHER OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; PEDESTALS; COMPUTER FURNITURE; WORK BENCHES; FURNITURE PARTITIONS AND SCREENS; LOCKERS; OFFICE SEATING, NAMELY, CHAIRS AND BENCHES; COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS COMPRISING CHAIRS, DESKS, CABINETS, AND SHELVING; MOBILE SHELVING SYSTEM; PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |