USPTO serial 76076739
AERODOMETER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AERODOMETER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications, namely, manuals, magazines, newsletters, and brochures, in the fields of marketing research, promotional incentive award programs and customer loyalty programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | conducting consumer and business incentive award programs to promote the purchase of goods and services of others and to promote traffic and usage of third party sites on the global computer network; customer loyalty programs to promote usage of credit, debit, and discount cards of others; providing information on marketing, and on promotional incentive award programs for promoting the goods and services of others, all via the global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |