USPTO serial 76076753
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY BROCHURES, PAMPHLETS AND GUIDES FOR USE IN CONDUCTING SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS PROMOTING RACIAL UNDERSTANDING, AWARENESS AND TOLERANCE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |