Drawing for SCRIPPS

USPTO serial 76077292

SCRIPPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCRIPPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of health careACTIVEApr 1, 1998
042Health care servicesACTIVEApr 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 28, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 28, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 28, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 31, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 31, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jul 11, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 20, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
May 3, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
May 3, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 17, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED
Mar 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 14, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 24, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 12, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 13, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance