USPTO serial 76077526
KNOWLEDGE GATEWAY STANDARDIZED LEARNINGCOMMUNITIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KNOWLEDGE GATEWAY STANDARDIZED LEARNINGCOMMUNITIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Sprinkle
STEVEN R SPRINKLE GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP100 CONGRESS AVE STE 1440AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT, ASSESSMENT, MANAGEMENT OF TRAINING AND EDUCATION INFORMATION AND MATERIALS FOR DELIVERY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGEMENT AND STRUCTURE OF LEGAL INFORMATION, INFORMATION SERVICES, SAFETY INFORMATION, BUSINESS INFORMATION, HEALTHCARE INFORMATION, SPIRITUAL INFORMATION, CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION, REAL ESTATE INFORMATION, FINANCE INFORMATION, EDUCATION INFORMATION, INSURANCE INFORMATION, ACCOUNTING INFORMATION AND LIFESTYLE INFORMATION AUTHORED BY OTHERS FOR DELIVERY OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING AND PROVIDING VIRTUAL CAMPUSES AND WEB-BASED TRAINING COURSES FOR ACCESS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING ACCESS TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DEVELOPING TRAINING COURSES TO BE DELIVERED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTE NETWORK; PROGRAMMING WEB-ENABLED TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS; PROVIDING ACCESS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF TRAINING COURSES PROVIDED VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND PROVIDING TROUBLESHOOTING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO BE DELIVERED VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND TELEPHONE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |