USPTO serial 76077756
TOPVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOPVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David T. Burse
DAVID T BURSE633 W FIFTH ST STE 4700LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2066UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and accessories for delivering visual perception tasks, as well as other perception stimuli; computer software and accessories for identifying and alleviating visual perception and acuity deficiencies; computer software and accessories for improving visual perception and acuity; computer software and accessories for developing improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing support and training on computer software to vision care professionals and individuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Administering visual perception tasks, as well as other perception stimuli, for identifying and alleviating visual perception and acuity deficiencies, and for improving visual perception and acuity in individuals; providing interactive training in the form of perception stimuli to develop improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |