USPTO serial 76077860
DOGMA/HERESY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOGMA/HERESY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agency services, business marketing services and public relation services including services for identifying conventional wisdom and contradictory positions for the purpose of developing new advertising and marketing approaches for clients; arranging and conducting meetings for identifying conventional wisdom and contradictory positions for the purpose of developing new advertising and marketing approaches for clients | ACTIVE | Dec 21, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |