USPTO serial 76078156
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
85521 Ottobrunn, DE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA PROCESSING; DATA PROCESSING DEVICES, NAMELY, PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT FOR COMPUTERS; CODE READERS IN THE NATURE OF MAGNETIC CODED CARD READERS; AND CODING DEVICES FOR DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR TIME RECORDING AND ACCESS CONTROL FOR USE IN DATA PROCESSING DEVICES; MONEY CARDS WITH ELECTRONIC OR SOLID STATE MEMORY IN THE NATURE OF MAGNETICALLY ENCODED DEBIT AND CREDIT CARDS, MAGNETICALLY CODED CARDS; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED VALUE CARDS WITH ELECTRONIC OR SOLID STATE MEMORY | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | SALES PROMOTIONS VIA THE INTERNET OR EXTRANET, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE SALE OF THE GOODS RECITED ABOVE IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS 9 | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER COUNSELING SERVICES; DEVELOPING DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |