Drawing for CHIPDRIVE

USPTO serial 76078156

CHIPDRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIPDRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA PROCESSING; DATA PROCESSING DEVICES, NAMELY, PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT FOR COMPUTERS; CODE READERS IN THE NATURE OF MAGNETIC CODED CARD READERS; AND CODING DEVICES FOR DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR TIME RECORDING AND ACCESS CONTROL FOR USE IN DATA PROCESSING DEVICES; MONEY CARDS WITH ELECTRONIC OR SOLID STATE MEMORY IN THE NATURE OF MAGNETICALLY ENCODED DEBIT AND CREDIT CARDS, MAGNETICALLY CODED CARDS; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED VALUE CARDS WITH ELECTRONIC OR SOLID STATE MEMORYACTIVE
035SALES PROMOTIONS VIA THE INTERNET OR EXTRANET, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE SALE OF THE GOODS RECITED ABOVE IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS 9ACTIVE
042COMPUTER COUNSELING SERVICES; DEVELOPING DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 22, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 19, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 15, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 15, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jul 24, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 24, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 3, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance