USPTO serial 76078179
SEALINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEYER JR, BROOKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEALINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn Sue Waldo
CAROLYN SUE WALDO HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC2601 BELTLINE RDCARROLLTON, TX 75006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Actuator modules for underwater oil and gas wells comprised of surface and underwater control units, a reel pack, monitoring electronics, and actuators, used to monitor, close and open oil and gas well safety valves | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |