USPTO serial 76080267
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DRIPPING SPRINGS, TX
DRIPPING SPRINGS, TX
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Biological organisms intended for subsequent implantation into the human body for treatment of cancer, aging diseases, Werner's Syndrome and progeria, improvement of health of an individual and prevention of disease and infection; biological organisms for prevention of cancer, aging diseases, Werner's Syndrome and progeria and improvement of health of an individual using telomere biology through implantation into the human body | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Minitechnology, nanotechnology, minibiotechnology or nanobiotechnology devices for implantation in the human body, namely, surgical implants for releasing disease-fighting substances into the body, nanofluidic channels, microfluidic channels, molecular nanogenerators, self assembling micro-machines, nana-explorers, sensors, pumps, molecular motors, labs-on-a-chip, microscopes, BioMOEMS (bio micro opto electrical mechanical systems), nanotubes, MEMS (micro electrical mechanical systems), MOEMS (micro opto electrical mechanical systems) and Microsystems, all of the foregoing for implantation into the human body for treatment of cancer, aging diseases, Werner's Syndrome and progeria, as well as for improvement of health of an individual or prevention of infection or disease, and all of which may incorporate artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical research, chemical research and microtechnology research for use in treatment of disease; testing of chemical, biological, biotechnological, nanotechonlogical and microtechnological organisms and devices and combinations thereof for use in treatment of disease, prevention of disease and/or overall improvement of health; laboratory research and product development in the fields of artificial intelligence, biological organisms, non-biological devices and biological-nonbiological hybrids for use in treatment of disease and medical conditions, prevention of disease or improvement of health and telmere biology | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |