USPTO serial 76082163
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LAKE FOREST, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ardelle C. St. George
ARDELLE C ST GEORGE ST GEORGE & CARNEGIE5405 ALTON PKWYSTE 5A PMB 540IRVINE, CA 92604| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing on-line information in the field of business and office supplies regarding dispensing services, product inventory and product utilization over local and wide area networks and the Global Community Network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |