Drawing for FREIGHTWISE

USPTO serial 76083705

FREIGHTWISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREIGHTWISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melvin A. Hunn

MELVIN A HUNN HILL & HUNN, LLP201 MAIN STSTE 1440FT WORTH, TX 76102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES; NAMELY, PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT, REVENUE AND YIELD MANAGEMENT, REVENUE AND YIELD OPTIMIZATION, AND FORECASTING AND PLANNING SERVICES; CONDUCTING INTERACTIVE AUCTIONS ONLINE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, NAMELY, OFFERING TRANSPORTATION AND FREIGHT SERVICES; ONLINE AUCTION AND BARTERING FEATURING TRANSPORTATION AND FREIGHT SERVICESACTIVE
039ORDER FULFILLMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, RECEIVING, SORTING, PROCESSING AND DISPOSING OF ORDERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ONLINE ORDER PROCESSING FOR OTHERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK FOR A VARIETY OF CONSUMER GOODS AND SERVICES, AND CUSTOMIZED SHIPPING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION OR DISTRIBUTION VIA AIR, RAIL, SHIP AND/OR SURFACE TRANSPORTATIONACTIVE
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERIZED INVENTORY AND PURCHASE ORDER MANAGEMENT IN THE TRANSPORTATION AND FREIGHT FIELDSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 31, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 1, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance