Drawing for ULTIMATE FREEDOM

USPTO serial 76083820

ULTIMATE FREEDOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2673736Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 14, 2003
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ULTIMATE FREEDOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine P. Searls, Gretchen L. Prochaska, David R. Halvorson

CHRISTINE P SEARLS GRETCHEN L PROCHAS QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 900DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the field of computer software applications; hosting business application software of customers on a computer server for a global computer network; maintenance of business application computer software; and technical support services, namely troubleshooting of business application computer software problems via telephone, electronic mail, computer, other electronic means and in personSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 24, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2009C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Jan 8, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 7, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 17, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Oct 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 18, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance