USPTO serial 76085743
LOCATION SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOCATION SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3E7, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services pertaining to management of location address information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic commerce services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents and information via computer terminals; and, wireless transmission and wireless electronic data interchange (EDI) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consulting services, namely, design and development of computer software designed to manage and transact with geographical information systems, geo-spatial and geo-technical processes and data; providing geographical information and geo-spatial and geo-technical data to others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |