USPTO serial 76086089
PERFORMANCE QUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMANCE QUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELISE R BLAKESLEE
MELISE R BLAKESLEE MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO DISCS AND TAPES FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS, EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYEE EVALUATION, AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT, ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENT; USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, MANUALS AND WORKBOOKS IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS, EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION, ALL RECORDED ON MAGNETIC, OPTICAL AND COMPUTER DISCS AND TAPES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, BOOKS, WORKBOOKS, NEWSLETTERS, NEWSPAPERS, MANUALS FOLDERS, CARDS AND POSTERS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS, EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYEE EVALUATION, AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES; BUSINESS CONSULTATION IN THE FIELDS OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT, ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS CONSULTATION IN THE FIELDS OF PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYMENT; AND PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELDS OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT, ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS, EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION, AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE MAGAZINES AND NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELDS OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYEE EVALUATION, AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sibson & Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PERFORMANCE QUEST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |