Drawing for IFINGER

USPTO serial 76087706

IFINGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IFINGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GLEN T OXTON

GLEN T OXTON HEALY & BAILLIE, LLP29 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10006-3293UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software that reads words in text contained in a web page, word processing program or other program, then displays text associated with that word from another program containing a reference word of any kind, such as a dictionary, a foreign language dictionary, a thesaurus, an encyclopedia, an atlas, etc.ACTIVE
016printed matter, namely, books, brochures, and pamphlets describing the use of the software; Instructional and educational material in the field of general reference worksACTIVE
038electronic transmission of messages and images via computer terminals; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; cellular telephone servicesACTIVE
042computer software design for others of software that enables viewing a reference work in another program based on a word selected in the program on the screenACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED
Aug 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 30, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 13, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance