USPTO serial 76089689
IVAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IVAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEATHER A DUNN
HEATHER A DUNN GRAY CARY WARE FREIDENRICH LLP400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO BROADBAND NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES, NAMELY, FOR THE STREAMING OF MULTIMEDIA CONTENT; PROVIDING BROADCAST SERVICES FOR THE STREAMING OF MULTIMEDIA CONTENT OVER BROADBAND NETWORKS; PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR THE INTERACTION AND TRANSMISSION OF DATA BETWEEN CONSUMER APPLIANCES AND BROADBAND NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES; PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR THE STREAMING AND TRANSMISSION OF DATA, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |