USPTO serial 76090718
CALLVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALLVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Crawley, West Sussex RH11 7XL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONNECTED TO TELEPHONY EQUIPMENT TO PROVIDE ACTIVITY BASED METRICS AND THE INTEGRATION OF EXTERNAL SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE RESEARCH, WRITING, UPDATING AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; DESIGN AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER MEMORY BANKS FOR OTHERS; ALL IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONNECTED TO TELEPHONY EQUIPMENT TO PROVIDE ACTIVITY BASED METRICS AND THE INTEGRATION OF EXTERNAL SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |