Drawing for HEALTHWARE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76091954

HEALTHWARE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3131503Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HEALTHWARE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arne M. Olson

ARNE M OLSON OLSON & HIERL LTD20 N WACKER DR FL 36CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR HOSPITALSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 15, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 16, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 29, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 3, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 29, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 6, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 23, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance