Drawing for HEALTHWARE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76091954

HEALTHWARE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3131503Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HEALTHWARE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arne M. Olson

ARNE M OLSON OLSON & HIERL LTD20 N WACKER DR FL 36CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR HOSPITALSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
May 15, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 16, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 29, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Sep 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 3, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Feb 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 29, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 6, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 23, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 22, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 26, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance