USPTO serial 76093243
PORCELANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PORCELANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
26600 TAIN L'HERMITAGE, FR
26600 TAIN L'HERMITAGE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert V. Vickers
ROBERT V VICKERS FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE SEVENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, ARTIFICIAL COFFEE, FLOUR, BAKERY PRODUCTS, BREAKFAST CEREALS, CEREALS-BASED SNACK FOODS, PROCESSED CEREALS, BREAD, PASTRY, CANDY, CHOCOLATES, FLAVORED ICES, HONEY, TREACLE, YEAST, BAKING POWDER, SALT, MUSTARD, VINEGAR, SAUCES, KETCHUP, SALAD DRESSINGS, MAYONNAISE, RELISH, SPICES, AND ICE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |