Drawing for E. 8

USPTO serial 76093736

E. 8

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E. 8?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANA BRODY-BROWN

ALEXANDRA J HORNE WHITE & CASE LLP5 PALO ALTO SQ 10TH FL3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT, FOR COLLECTING AND ANALYZING SALES DATA AND CUSTOMER DEMOGRAPHICS, CHARACTERISTICS AND PREFERENCES AND FOR COMPUTER-GENERATED MARKETING, NAMELY SOFTWARE TO DEVELOP E-MAILING LISTS, DIRECT MAILING LISTS, PHONE SOLICITATION LISTS, CREATE ADVERTISEMENTS, DISTRIBUTE THE ADVERTISING, AND TRACK AND GENERATE REPORTS ON RESPONSES TO ADVERTISEMENTS, ALL BY USING FUNCTIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS, DATA, EXTRACTION, DATA MINING, DATA STORAGE, DATABASE MARKETING, DECISION ANALYSIS, MONITORING AND DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATIONACTIVE
035BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICESACTIVE
042SOFTWARE INSTALLATION SERVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 3, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 3, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 22, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 8, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 28, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 22, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 14, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance