Drawing for VOICE BLAST

USPTO serial 76094734

VOICE BLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOICE BLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Smith

SUSAN L SMITH ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP1020 MARSH RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038On-line communication services, namely services allowing users to record, store, play and transmit sound and speech content as an attachment to electronic messages and web pages by means of a global computer networkABANDONEDFeb 7, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 29, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance