Drawing for FAMILY FIRST

USPTO serial 76096205

FAMILY FIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAMILY FIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING CONTENT PROMOTING TRADITIONAL INNATE RELIGIOUS AND FAMILY VALUES AND CONTENT FOR INSTILLING LOST, FORGOTTEN, OR NEGLECTED INNATE VALUES; AND BOOKLETS AND PAMPHLETS CONTAINING CONTENT PROMOTING TRADITIONAL INNATE RELIGIOUS AND FAMILY VALUES AND CONTENT FOR INSTILLING LOST, FORGOTTEN, OR NEGLECTED INNATE VALUESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Mar 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 9, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2002REINREINSTATED
Jun 11, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance