USPTO serial 76096867
NANOVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NANOVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Royston Herts SG8 6EE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander A. P. Singha
ALEXANDER A P SINGHA FOGNANI GUIBORD HOMSY & ROBERTS LLP1350 AVE OF THE AMERICAS STE 3100NEW YORK, NY 10019-4801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication apparatus and instruments, comprised of, cellular radio and telecommunications systems, comprised of, transmitters, receivers and antennas; apparatus and instruments, comprised of , radio and telecommunications transmitters and receivers, computer hardware and software for use in delivering data and voice communication services, all for use in telephone exchanges; base stations for telephone networks for use in supporting multiple interfaces in cellular radio and telecommunications systems; apparatus for the transmission and reproduction of sound and images, comprised of cellular base stations, vehicular transceiver, telephone transmitters and receivers; parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |