USPTO serial 76097522
KATALYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KATALYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
28013 Madrid, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPH, TELEPHONY AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION SETS AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, LAND-LINE TELEPHONES, MOBILE TELEPHONES, TELEPHONE EXCHANGES, ANSWERING MACHINES, RADIOTELEPHONES, FAX MACHINE, DATA PROCESSING DEVICES, MAGNETIC IDENTIFICATION CARDS; COMPUTER AND DEVICES FOR DATA PROCESSING INCORPORATING MICRO-PROCESSORS, COMPUTER RECORDED PROGRAMS FOR TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, IMAGE MAGNETIC CARRIERS, MULTI-MEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROM FOR TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, COMPUTER PERIPHERAL MEANS, NAMELY, MOUSES, KEYBOARDS, AND PRINTING MACHINES FOR COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |