USPTO serial 76098068
ELEGANT DINING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'LEAR, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEGANT DINING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLIE HOURIZADEH
ELLIE HOURIZADEH MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP2049 CENTURY PARK E 34TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3208UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Tableware (namely - plastic spoons, plastic forks, and plastic knives), cutlery (namely - spoons, forks, and knives not made from or coated with precious metal), flatware (namely - spoons, forks, and knives not made from or coated with precious metal), knives (namely - chef, butcher, kitchen, palette, pruning, and paring), cleavers, cheese slicers, egg slicers, pizza slicers, and pizza cutters | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bakeware, beverageware, bowls, buckets (more specifically - wine, champagne, and ice), casseroles (more specifically - dishes), china (specifically - figurines, sculptures, ornaments, plates, saucers, serving dishes, and serving utensils made from china), non-insulated containers for foods and beverages, cookware (specifically - pots, pot lids, pans, pan lids, double boilers, skillets, spatulas, whisks, turners, rolling pins, strainers, mixing spoons, serving spoons, serving tongs, serving ladles, and serving forks), cups, decanters, dinnerware in general, earthenware (specifically - earthenware basins, figurines, mugs, plates, saucers, and jars), beverage and cooking glassware, non-electric kettles for tea or coffee, mosaics of glass, porcelain specifically - figurines, sculptures, ornaments, plates, saucers, serving dishes, and serving utensils made from porcelain), and tableware | ACTIVE | Jul 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |