USPTO serial 76098361
SURE-LOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURE-LOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES A. WAHL
JAMES A WAHL KRASS MONROE PA8000 NORMAN CTR DR STE 1000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ACCESSORIES FOR TABLE SAWS, NAMELY MITER GAUGES | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |