Drawing for HYPER G

USPTO serial 76100179

HYPER G

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARNER, CHRISTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPER G?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARTHUR F. DIONNE

ARTHUR F DIONNE MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER LLPCITY PL II 185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for the creation, the operation and the use of data bases which are specific for medical purposes and medical servicesACTIVE
010Physiotherapy clothing, namely, ballasted integral or semi-integral combinations of pants, shirts, sweat suits, shorts and jackets for use by patients in medical settingsACTIVE
025Clothing for sports training, namely, ballasted integral or semi-integral combinations of pants, shirts, suits, shorts, and jacketsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 22, 200244EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED
Jun 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance