USPTO serial 76101860
REITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl Hormann
KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICE OF KARL HORMANN86 SPARKS STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02138-2216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, soaps, dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather, goods made of such materials, namely shopping bags, key fobs, wallets, suitcases, trucks and traveling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Combs; sponges made of natural and artificial materials; brushes; brush making materials; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, cleaning brushes, cleaning cloths, and cleaning rags; shoe polish and cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, shoes, footwear, headwear and belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ludwig Reiter Schuhmanufaktur Ges.m.b.H
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named REITER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |