USPTO serial 76102902
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CREATING AND MAINTAINING ONLINE EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS AND EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF ONLINE EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS AND EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS; DESIGN AND EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS, HOSTING ONLINE EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS FOR OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ONLINE EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |