USPTO serial 76103139
SAGEBRUSH VINEYARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAGEBRUSH VINEYARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sumac Ridge Estate Winery (2000) Ltd.
Niagara Falls, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Sumac Ridge Estate Winery (2000) Ltd.
SUMAC RIDGE ESTATE WINERY LTD.
NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CA
SUMAC RIDGE ESTATE WINERY LTD.
NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY WINE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sumac Ridge Estate Winery (2000) Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by SUMAC RIDGE ESTATE WINERY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SUMAC RIDGE ESTATE WINERY LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named SAGEBRUSH VINEYARDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |