USPTO serial 76103174
TRIVIAL NEWSFRONT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIVIAL NEWSFRONT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BILLINGS, MT
BILLINGS, MT
Billings, MT
Billings, MT
Montgomery, AL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newspaper devoted to odd and interesting stories | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steele, David L.
- Other trademarks owned by Steele, Cecelia A.
- Other trademarks owned by Steele, David L.
- Other trademarks owned by Steele, Cecelia A.
- Other trademarks owned by Tidbits Media, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named TRIVIAL NEWSFRONT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |