USPTO serial 76103257
HAMPTON COURT PALACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAMPTON COURT PALACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claude A.S. Hamrick
MICHAEL K BOSWORTH BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, LLPPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, SOAPS, PERFUMERY, ESSENTIAL OILS (FOR PERSONAL USE), HAIR LOTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND PHOTOGRAPHIC APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR DEVELOPING, PROCESSING AND PRINTING PHOTOGRAPHIC, LITHOGRAPHIC AND GRAPHIC ARTS FILM; PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS, PROJECTORS, ENLARGERS, LENSES, SCREENS AND FILTERS; ELECTRONIC FLASH AND LIGHTING APPARATUS FOR USE IN PHOTOGRAPHY; MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS, NAMELY, RECORDING DISCS, AND COMPACT DISCS; MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROMS FEATURING HISTORICAL CONTENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR EDUCATIONAL USE FEATURING HISTORICAL CONTENT; VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS; PRE-RECORDED EDUCATIONAL COMPACT DISCS, AUDIO TAPES AND VIDEO TAPES FEATURING HISTORICAL CONTENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |