Drawing for HOTFRAMEWORK

USPTO serial 76107338

HOTFRAMEWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOTFRAMEWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computer data center management services; electronic commerce services, namely dissemination of advertising for others via an online electronic communications network, and order processing servicesACTIVE
036Electronic commerce services, namely, electronic credit card and debit transactions, fund transfers, and payment processingACTIVE
038Electronic commerce services, namely, electronic transmission and reception of data, documents and information via computer; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; telecommunications protocol telephony gateway services; and satellite transmission servicesACTIVE
039Computer and technology related services, namely, providing storage and retrieval services for electronic data; and serverless computer backup services, namely, providing secure electronic archiving of electronic data, documents and messagesACTIVE
040Database replication servicesACTIVE
042Designing, creating, maintaining, managing, implementing and hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer software applications deployment for others on a global computer network; co-location services for internal, extranet, intranet and global computer network servers for others; evaluating, administering and monitoring internal, extranet, intranet and global computer network servers for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 29, 2002REINREINSTATED
Jul 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 18, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance