USPTO serial 76107446
WKD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WKD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT DRINKS; BREWED MALT-BASED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE IN THE NATURE OF A BEER | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PRODUCED FROM A BREWED MALT BASE WITH NATURAL FRUIT FLAVOURS; ALCOHOLIC FRUIT-BASED BEVERAGE; ALCOHOLIC FRUIT PUNCH; ALCOHOLIC FRUIT COOLERS; PREPARED ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |