Drawing for H R P HISTORIC ROYAL PALACES

USPTO serial 76107772

H R P HISTORIC ROYAL PALACES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H R P HISTORIC ROYAL PALACES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Non-precious metal replicas of historical structures and non-precious metal items based on the historical structures, namely lampbases; lampshadesACTIVE
018Textiles and textile goods, namely, bags to hold toiletries, fabric carry-all bags and purses; umbrellas, parasolsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 29, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 7, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2004PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 18, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 17, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 13, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 19, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 10, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance