Drawing for POLYMER CARD

USPTO serial 76109098

POLYMER CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYMER CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009rechargeable batteries, telephones, personal digital assistants, and computersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 1, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 1, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 17, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 21, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 19, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 31, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance