USPTO serial 76109272
CH. IND.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2785299Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2003
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CH. IND.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75019 Paris, FR
75019 Paris, FR
75019 Paris, FR
91100 Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
91100 Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
91100 Neuilly Sur Seine, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYEGLASSES, AND SUNGLASSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION OF LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, PURSES, BACKPACKS, LUGGAGE, SHOPPING BAGS, HANDBAGS, CARD WALLETS, AND WALLETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, TABLE LINEN, HOUSEHOLD LINEN, AND BATH TOWELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, TROUSERS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, SHORTS, BERMUDAS, COATS, RAINCOATS, JACKETS, PULLOVERS, T-SHIRTS, SWIMWEAR, UNDERGARMENTS, FOOTWEAR, AND HEADWEAR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chemla, David
- Other trademarks owned by Chemla, David
- Other trademarks owned by Chemla, David
- Other trademarks owned by Teman, Michel
- Other trademarks owned by Teman, Michel
- Other trademarks owned by Teman, Michel
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CH. IND.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |