USPTO serial 76109643
POSEIDON TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2967392Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2005
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POSEIDON TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-92100 Boulogne, FR
F-92100 Boulogne, FR
13600 LA CIOTAT CEDEX, FR
BOULOGNE, FR
BOULOGNE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
Susan Upton Douglass Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Alarm or warning system for monitoring swimming pools for drowning victims comprised of a network of cameras, sonars, heat sensors and motion sensors, alarm or warning devices, a central computer monitoring unit, and computer software for processing data received from the system's various acquisition devices for interpreting and processing such data, and for triggering an alarm or warning devices, and user manuals sold as a unit therewith; alarm or warning devices, namely, audible alarms, visual alarms, computer monitors and displays, and portable alarms that are worn as watches or pagers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 2001 |
| 037 | Maintenance of swimming pool alarm systems, namely, alarm systems for monitoring swimming pools for drowning victims | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 2001 |
| 042 | Maintenance and updating of computer software, namely, software used with swimming pool alarm systems used for monitoring swimming pools for drowning victims | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POSEIDON S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by POSEIDON S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MG INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks owned by VISION IQ
- Other trademarks owned by VISION IQ
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named POSEIDON TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2016 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |