Drawing for NATIVE XML

USPTO serial 76110479

NATIVE XML

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIVE XML?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY H FECHTER

GARY H FECHTER MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP245 PARK AVE 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10167-0001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer database software for use in storing advertising giveaways, namely, redeemable certificates, coupons, and corporate logos in extensible markup languageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 12, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 10, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 2, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 25, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance