USPTO serial 76110511
EPSM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPSM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Klinger,
MICHAEL A SILEO JR MICROSEMI CORPORATION740 E CAMPBELL RD STE 900RICHARDSON, TX 75081UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microelectronic semiconductors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |